The convergence of innovation studies and regional development theory has generated some of the most stimulating debates in the social sciences about the rise of territorial innovation systems. But the literature that emerged from this convergence, while it acknowledged the role of institutional factors, also came at a cost. It privileged economic competitiveness at the expense of social solidarity and empowerment. It also neglected the broader capitalist forces that condition interregional dynamics. To redress these problems, this chapter pursues two aims. First, it contends that the work of Frank Moulaert and colleagues helped to remedy the first shortcoming by asserting the political role of social innovation in development. Second, it offers a critical reading of social innovation models - many of which are caught in the “local” trap - and suggests that the Foundational Economy can provide a multi-scalar strategy for overcoming the localist limits of mainstream territorial innovation models.

From technological to social innovation: Rehabilitating the state and civil society in the development debate / Morgan, K; Martinelli, Flavia. - (2019), pp. 30-37. [10.4337/9781788974288.00013]

From technological to social innovation: Rehabilitating the state and civil society in the development debate

MARTINELLI, Flavia
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2019-01-01

Abstract

The convergence of innovation studies and regional development theory has generated some of the most stimulating debates in the social sciences about the rise of territorial innovation systems. But the literature that emerged from this convergence, while it acknowledged the role of institutional factors, also came at a cost. It privileged economic competitiveness at the expense of social solidarity and empowerment. It also neglected the broader capitalist forces that condition interregional dynamics. To redress these problems, this chapter pursues two aims. First, it contends that the work of Frank Moulaert and colleagues helped to remedy the first shortcoming by asserting the political role of social innovation in development. Second, it offers a critical reading of social innovation models - many of which are caught in the “local” trap - and suggests that the Foundational Economy can provide a multi-scalar strategy for overcoming the localist limits of mainstream territorial innovation models.
2019
978 1 78897 427 1
Urban and regional development; Territorial innovation systems; Social innovation; Role of the state; Foundational economy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Martinelli_2019_Thoughts_FromTechnological_editor.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Saggio di rassegna critica del dibattito corrente sull'argomento.
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.79 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/11613
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact