This paper studies the thermal and acoustic performance of straw bale walls used in timberframe semi-detached houses recently built in Sicily (Southern Italy), and compares them to similar walls whereexpanded polystyrene (EPS) is adopted in place of the straw bales. In-situ measurements were carried out toanalyse the acoustic performance of both wall typologies. The weighted Apparent Sound Reduction Index for thepartition wall between two houses, as well as the weighted Standardized Level Difference for the façades wereassessed based on the ISO Standards 16283. Moreover, the two insulating solutions were compared in relation totheir steady and dynamic thermal performance. The results underline that the acoustic performance of the strawbale walls is far better than the walls adopting traditional EPS insulation. However, slight improvements aresuggested to further increase the sound insulation properties of straw bales. On the other hand, EPS is a moreeffective thermal insulation even if straw bale walls comply with Italian standards. Finally, the dynamicperformance of straw bales should be improved by increasing their density. Overall, the proposed straw bales usedcan be conveniently used in low-energy and n-ZEB buildings in warm and mild countries.
Performance comparison between building insulating materials made of straw bales and EPS for timber walls / Evola, G; Cascone, S; Sciuto, G; Baroetto Parisi, C. - In: IOP CONFERENCE SERIES: MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1757-8981. - 609:7(2019), pp. 1637-1642. (Intervento presentato al convegno 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation and Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2019) tenutosi a Bari, Italy nel 5-7 settembre 2019).
Performance comparison between building insulating materials made of straw bales and EPS for timber walls
Cascone S
;
2019-01-01
Abstract
This paper studies the thermal and acoustic performance of straw bale walls used in timberframe semi-detached houses recently built in Sicily (Southern Italy), and compares them to similar walls whereexpanded polystyrene (EPS) is adopted in place of the straw bales. In-situ measurements were carried out toanalyse the acoustic performance of both wall typologies. The weighted Apparent Sound Reduction Index for thepartition wall between two houses, as well as the weighted Standardized Level Difference for the façades wereassessed based on the ISO Standards 16283. Moreover, the two insulating solutions were compared in relation totheir steady and dynamic thermal performance. The results underline that the acoustic performance of the strawbale walls is far better than the walls adopting traditional EPS insulation. However, slight improvements aresuggested to further increase the sound insulation properties of straw bales. On the other hand, EPS is a moreeffective thermal insulation even if straw bale walls comply with Italian standards. Finally, the dynamicperformance of straw bales should be improved by increasing their density. Overall, the proposed straw bales usedcan be conveniently used in low-energy and n-ZEB buildings in warm and mild countries.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Evola_2019_IOP_Performance_editor.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
505.48 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
505.48 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.