This paper reports the results inherent to technical performances of three different sprayers used in citrus orchards in Calabria (Southern Italy). Accordingly, quantitative and qualitative analyses of the spray were performed. Spray quantitative assessment, related to foliar deposit and losses to the ground, was based on the colorimetric method. While spray qualitative evaluation considered water-sensitive paper (WSP) image analysis. This was performed subsequently to field experimental trials, which consisted in spraying citrus orchards with a dye solution and collecting the required samples, i.e., leaves for foliar deposit, petri dishes for ground losses, and WSP for spray qualitative analysis. Statistically analyzed data showed significant differences between the assessed sprayers considering foliar deposition (Kruskal-Wallis: χ2 = 40.327, df = 2, p = 1.75e−9). In addition, some unfavorable aspects were encountered regarding ground losses and qualitative distribution when applying plant protection products with the tested sprayers.

Analysis of Spray Behavior Using Different Sprayers in Citrus Groves / Benalia, S.; Violi, L.; Barreca, P.; Zimbalatti, G.; Bernardi, B.. - 252:(2022), pp. 402-410. (Intervento presentato al convegno 6th International Conference on Safety, Health and Welfare in Agriculture and Agro-food Systems, SHWA 2021 tenutosi a Ragusa nel 2021) [10.1007/978-3-030-98092-4_41].

Analysis of Spray Behavior Using Different Sprayers in Citrus Groves

Benalia S.
;
Zimbalatti G.;Bernardi B.
2022-01-01

Abstract

This paper reports the results inherent to technical performances of three different sprayers used in citrus orchards in Calabria (Southern Italy). Accordingly, quantitative and qualitative analyses of the spray were performed. Spray quantitative assessment, related to foliar deposit and losses to the ground, was based on the colorimetric method. While spray qualitative evaluation considered water-sensitive paper (WSP) image analysis. This was performed subsequently to field experimental trials, which consisted in spraying citrus orchards with a dye solution and collecting the required samples, i.e., leaves for foliar deposit, petri dishes for ground losses, and WSP for spray qualitative analysis. Statistically analyzed data showed significant differences between the assessed sprayers considering foliar deposition (Kruskal-Wallis: χ2 = 40.327, df = 2, p = 1.75e−9). In addition, some unfavorable aspects were encountered regarding ground losses and qualitative distribution when applying plant protection products with the tested sprayers.
2022
978-3-030-98091-7
978-3-030-98092-4
Citrus
Foliar deposition
Ground losses
Plant protection equipment
Spray analysis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Benalia et al. 2022_Lect. Notes Civ. Eng_Analysis_Editor.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: versione editore
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.2 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Benalia et al. RAGUSA_SHWA_2021_069_post print.pdf

Open Access dal 24/03/2023

Descrizione: Versione post print
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 307.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
307.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/121298
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact