According to the sentence n. 164/2020, as commented below, the Constitutional Court subverts a (apparent) precedent of 2015, approving the establishment of POER (organizational positions with high responsibility), due to their non-managerial character and their temporary nature. The comment focuses on delicate issues, from the constitutional principle of the public competition, to the legal nature of the tax agencies, and highlights lights and shadows of the verdict.

La Consulta salva “il Re Pallido” nell’annosa vicenda delle cd. Poer (posizioni organizzative a elevata responsabilità) presso l’Agenzia delle Entrate

Giuseppe Tropea
2020

Abstract

According to the sentence n. 164/2020, as commented below, the Constitutional Court subverts a (apparent) precedent of 2015, approving the establishment of POER (organizational positions with high responsibility), due to their non-managerial character and their temporary nature. The comment focuses on delicate issues, from the constitutional principle of the public competition, to the legal nature of the tax agencies, and highlights lights and shadows of the verdict.
POER - organizational position - principle of the public competition - tax agencies
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020_6_25_Tropea.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 341.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
341.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/71781
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact