Deforestation, which removes soil protection by plant leafs and roots, causes severe soil erosion, since the beneficial effects of plant cover and root actions on soil erodibility are lost. Hydromulching has been found to be a suitable technique for erosion control, but little research has been carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of hydromulch roots in controlling rill erosion in deforested areas due to overland flow. This study has evaluated rill detachment capacity (Dc) and erodibility (Kr, which is the slope of the equation regressing Dc and critical shear stress) in hydromulched and bare plots (1.3-m long and 0.5-m wide) on soils sampled in deforested hillslopes of Northern Iran; the most important root parameters of the grass used for hydromulching were also measured, such as root density and diameter. Dc has been measured in a laboratory flume under four bed slopes (10, 15, 20, and 25%) and five water discharges (0.26, 0.35, 0.45, 0.56, and 0.67 L m−1 s−1) with five replications per experiment. Dc was lower (on average − 44%, with a minimum reduction of −40% at a slope of 25% and a maximum −50% at a slope of 15%) in the hydromulched soils compared to the untreated plot. Dc was positively and negatively correlated, with diameter and density of hydromulch roots, respectively. Rill erodibility was noticeably lower (−81%) in the hydromulched soil compared to the bare plot. By regressing Dc on shear stress, rill erodibility and critical shear stress for deforested hillslopes (treated with hydromulching or left bare) were given. These parameters are useful to hydrologists in applications of physically-based erosion models.

Hydromulch roots reduce rill detachment capacity by overland flow in deforested hillslopes

Zema D
2021-01-01

Abstract

Deforestation, which removes soil protection by plant leafs and roots, causes severe soil erosion, since the beneficial effects of plant cover and root actions on soil erodibility are lost. Hydromulching has been found to be a suitable technique for erosion control, but little research has been carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of hydromulch roots in controlling rill erosion in deforested areas due to overland flow. This study has evaluated rill detachment capacity (Dc) and erodibility (Kr, which is the slope of the equation regressing Dc and critical shear stress) in hydromulched and bare plots (1.3-m long and 0.5-m wide) on soils sampled in deforested hillslopes of Northern Iran; the most important root parameters of the grass used for hydromulching were also measured, such as root density and diameter. Dc has been measured in a laboratory flume under four bed slopes (10, 15, 20, and 25%) and five water discharges (0.26, 0.35, 0.45, 0.56, and 0.67 L m−1 s−1) with five replications per experiment. Dc was lower (on average − 44%, with a minimum reduction of −40% at a slope of 25% and a maximum −50% at a slope of 15%) in the hydromulched soils compared to the untreated plot. Dc was positively and negatively correlated, with diameter and density of hydromulch roots, respectively. Rill erodibility was noticeably lower (−81%) in the hydromulched soil compared to the bare plot. By regressing Dc on shear stress, rill erodibility and critical shear stress for deforested hillslopes (treated with hydromulching or left bare) were given. These parameters are useful to hydrologists in applications of physically-based erosion models.
2021
Deforestation
Erosion control
Rill erodibility
Rill erosion
Root diameter
Root weight density
Shear stress
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Parhizkar_2021_Hydromulch_editor.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 6.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.42 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/123348
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact