This paper presents a groundbreaking integration ofMultiple CriteriaDecision Making (MCDM) with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for tourism accommodation performance assessment, addressing fundamental limitations in traditional preference elicitation methods. We introduce the XAI-Enhanced MCDM Convergence Theorem that establishes theoretical foundations for combining classical MCDM methods with machine learning explanations, providing objective, data-driven criterion weights that eliminate subjective bias inherent in expert judgments. Ourmethodology extendsTOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and AHP by incorporating Shapley values, Integrated Gradients, and Expected Gradients to derive interpretable multi-criteria rankings. Applied to Lower Aosta Valley accommodation data, our framework demonstrates 18% improvement in ranking accuracy over traditional MCDM approaches while revealing critical sustainability threshold effects previously undetected. The proposed XAI-enhanced framework addresses the longstanding challenge of criterion weight elicitation in MCDM through empirically-derived attribution scores, representing a paradigm shift from subjective to objective multi-criteria analysis in economic decision-making contexts.
Explainable Multi-criteria Decision Making for tourism economics: integrating XAI with MCDM for a robust accommodation performance assessment / Ciano, Tiziana; Ferrara, Massimiliano. - In: DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE. - ISSN 1593-8883. - (2025), pp. 1-23. [10.1007/s10203-025-00553-6]
Explainable Multi-criteria Decision Making for tourism economics: integrating XAI with MCDM for a robust accommodation performance assessment
Ferrara, MassimilianoConceptualization
2025-01-01
Abstract
This paper presents a groundbreaking integration ofMultiple CriteriaDecision Making (MCDM) with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for tourism accommodation performance assessment, addressing fundamental limitations in traditional preference elicitation methods. We introduce the XAI-Enhanced MCDM Convergence Theorem that establishes theoretical foundations for combining classical MCDM methods with machine learning explanations, providing objective, data-driven criterion weights that eliminate subjective bias inherent in expert judgments. Ourmethodology extendsTOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and AHP by incorporating Shapley values, Integrated Gradients, and Expected Gradients to derive interpretable multi-criteria rankings. Applied to Lower Aosta Valley accommodation data, our framework demonstrates 18% improvement in ranking accuracy over traditional MCDM approaches while revealing critical sustainability threshold effects previously undetected. The proposed XAI-enhanced framework addresses the longstanding challenge of criterion weight elicitation in MCDM through empirically-derived attribution scores, representing a paradigm shift from subjective to objective multi-criteria analysis in economic decision-making contexts.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ferrara_2025_DEF_ Multi-criteria Decision Making_editor.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
334.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
334.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


