Logging causes damage on residual trees, with differing characteristics and severities. The causal agent, as well as the size and type of injury, is influenced by the type of machines, the harvesting technology adopted, and the machine operator. This study descriptively documents residual tree damage observed in two sledge-yarding operations conducted under contrasting stand and operational conditions: a beech stand managed with a full-tree system and a Scots pine stand managed with a cut-to-length system. Two stands were selected: the harvesting intensity was 50% in the coniferous stand (salvage logging) and 20% in the deciduous stand (thinning). In each stand, six 20 × 20 m plots (0.04 ha) were delineated to assess residual tree damage. In the two observed cases, the beech operation showed a higher proportion of damaged residual trees, 32.2%, than the Scots pine operation, 5.3%. In the deciduous stand, bark injuries were mainly slight wood exposure (75%), whereas in the coniferous stand, crushed bark (42.9%) was most frequent, followed by slight wood exposure (35.7%). No concerning damage to seedlings was detected. In general, the number of damaged trees and the severity of injuries were considerably lower than those typically observed when extracting with a cable skidder, and especially with an adapted farm tractor. To reduce mechanical damage to residual trees, protective devices can be deployed around trees at risk of root and stem injury. Another effective measure is to financially motivate workers to implement environmentally sound forest operations.
Study of Residual Stand Damages During Sledge Yarding Extraction / Proto, Andrea Rosario; Stoilov, Stanimir; Borz, Stelian Alexandru. - In: FORESTS. - ISSN 1999-4907. - 17:5(2026). [10.3390/f17050603]
Study of Residual Stand Damages During Sledge Yarding Extraction
Proto, Andrea Rosario
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Logging causes damage on residual trees, with differing characteristics and severities. The causal agent, as well as the size and type of injury, is influenced by the type of machines, the harvesting technology adopted, and the machine operator. This study descriptively documents residual tree damage observed in two sledge-yarding operations conducted under contrasting stand and operational conditions: a beech stand managed with a full-tree system and a Scots pine stand managed with a cut-to-length system. Two stands were selected: the harvesting intensity was 50% in the coniferous stand (salvage logging) and 20% in the deciduous stand (thinning). In each stand, six 20 × 20 m plots (0.04 ha) were delineated to assess residual tree damage. In the two observed cases, the beech operation showed a higher proportion of damaged residual trees, 32.2%, than the Scots pine operation, 5.3%. In the deciduous stand, bark injuries were mainly slight wood exposure (75%), whereas in the coniferous stand, crushed bark (42.9%) was most frequent, followed by slight wood exposure (35.7%). No concerning damage to seedlings was detected. In general, the number of damaged trees and the severity of injuries were considerably lower than those typically observed when extracting with a cable skidder, and especially with an adapted farm tractor. To reduce mechanical damage to residual trees, protective devices can be deployed around trees at risk of root and stem injury. Another effective measure is to financially motivate workers to implement environmentally sound forest operations.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


