This article is about regional disparities and regional policy in Europe, with a focus on Italy. The point of departure is the persistence of regional inequalities in many European countries, after some fifty years of regional policies. In many cases, intra-national regional divergence has actually resumed after the convergence observed in the third quarter of the twentieth century. Why is that? What went wrong? To answer these questions, first the evolution of regional policy in Europe is reviewed, challenging three pillars of the current EU Cohesion policy: the faith in government decentralisation, the ‘local development governance’ paradigm, and the competitive approach. The case of Southern Italy is then presented, as an illustration of both the changes in regional policy and some failures of Cohesion policy. Subsequently, what was ‘lost in translation’, in the shift from the ‘national’ regional policies of the 1960s and 1970s to the multi-level EU Cohesion policy framework established in the 1990s, is highlighted. It is argued that much has been given up in terms of unitary strategic perspective, financial commitment, and leverage, whereas the ‘local development policy governance’ approach tends to reproduces and enhances regional disparities. Finally, directions for a renewed policy commitment are proposed.

Lost in translation. Regional policy from national strategy to EU competitive framework

MARTINELLI Flavia
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020-01-01

Abstract

This article is about regional disparities and regional policy in Europe, with a focus on Italy. The point of departure is the persistence of regional inequalities in many European countries, after some fifty years of regional policies. In many cases, intra-national regional divergence has actually resumed after the convergence observed in the third quarter of the twentieth century. Why is that? What went wrong? To answer these questions, first the evolution of regional policy in Europe is reviewed, challenging three pillars of the current EU Cohesion policy: the faith in government decentralisation, the ‘local development governance’ paradigm, and the competitive approach. The case of Southern Italy is then presented, as an illustration of both the changes in regional policy and some failures of Cohesion policy. Subsequently, what was ‘lost in translation’, in the shift from the ‘national’ regional policies of the 1960s and 1970s to the multi-level EU Cohesion policy framework established in the 1990s, is highlighted. It is argued that much has been given up in terms of unitary strategic perspective, financial commitment, and leverage, whereas the ‘local development policy governance’ approach tends to reproduces and enhances regional disparities. Finally, directions for a renewed policy commitment are proposed.
2020
Regional disparities, regional policy, EU cohesion policy, decentralisation, local development governance, Italy, less favoured regions
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Martinelli_2020_Riv.Econ.Mezzog._LostInTranslation_post.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 304.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
304.54 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/56199
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact