On 11th November 2008, four important decisions of the Italian Corte di Cassazione (United Sections) fixed a new and singular interpretation of Article 2059 of the Italian Civil Code (about “non-patrimonial damage”), by establishing principles that must be applied by all Italian courts. According to the Supreme Court Judges, compensation of non pecuniary loss requires previous assessment of the elements of civil tort (conduct – damage – causation) and, in cases where the law does not specifically provide for its recovery, compensation can be allowed only where there is a grave violation of the constitutional rights of the person and the damage is serious. The Third Section of the Court decided recently to apply the same rules in the matter of the right to privacy (although in this case there is a specific provision for the compensation of non-patrimonial damages). The solution cannot be shared. The “filters” introduced by the Supreme Court appear to be more appropriate for the evaluation of the “quantum” rather than the “an” debeatur. The recent interpretation of Article 2059 and of many rules created to protect important fundamental rights (like privacy) ultimately takes the Italian Juridical System very far from the models and the guidelines followed in Europe.

Danno da illegittimo trattamento dei dati personali, tra "inasprimento sanzionatorio" europeo ed "interpretazioni restrittive" della giurisprudenza italiana / VIGLIANISI FERRARO, Angelo. - In: RIVISTA DI DIRITTO PRIVATO. - ISSN 1128-2142. - 1(2020), pp. 85-107.

Danno da illegittimo trattamento dei dati personali, tra "inasprimento sanzionatorio" europeo ed "interpretazioni restrittive" della giurisprudenza italiana

Angelo Viglianisi Ferraro
2020-01-01

Abstract

On 11th November 2008, four important decisions of the Italian Corte di Cassazione (United Sections) fixed a new and singular interpretation of Article 2059 of the Italian Civil Code (about “non-patrimonial damage”), by establishing principles that must be applied by all Italian courts. According to the Supreme Court Judges, compensation of non pecuniary loss requires previous assessment of the elements of civil tort (conduct – damage – causation) and, in cases where the law does not specifically provide for its recovery, compensation can be allowed only where there is a grave violation of the constitutional rights of the person and the damage is serious. The Third Section of the Court decided recently to apply the same rules in the matter of the right to privacy (although in this case there is a specific provision for the compensation of non-patrimonial damages). The solution cannot be shared. The “filters” introduced by the Supreme Court appear to be more appropriate for the evaluation of the “quantum” rather than the “an” debeatur. The recent interpretation of Article 2059 and of many rules created to protect important fundamental rights (like privacy) ultimately takes the Italian Juridical System very far from the models and the guidelines followed in Europe.
2020
Dati personali; Illegittimo trattamento
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Viglianisi Ferraro_2020_RDP_Danno_editor.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 876.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
876.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/59685
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact