On 11th November 2008, four important decisions of the Italian Corte di Cassazione (United Sections) fixed a new and singular interpretation of Article 2059 of the Italian Civil Code (about “non-patrimonial damage”), by establishing principles that must be applied by all Italian courts. According to the Supreme Court Judges, compensation of non pecuniary loss requires previous assessment of the elements of civil tort (conduct – damage – causation) and, in cases where the law does not specifically provide for its recovery, compensation can be allowed only where there is a grave violation of the constitutional rights of the person and the damage is serious. The Third Section of the Court decided recently to apply the same rules in the matter of the right to privacy (although in this case there is a specific provision for the compensation of non-patrimonial damages). The solution cannot be shared. The “filters” introduced by the Supreme Court appear to be more appropriate for the evaluation of the “quantum” rather than the “an” debeatur. The recent interpretation of Article 2059 and of many rules created to protect important fundamental rights (like privacy) ultimately takes the Italian Juridical System very far from the models and the guidelines followed in Europe.
Danno da illegittimo trattamento dei dati personali, tra "inasprimento sanzionatorio" europeo ed "interpretazioni restrittive" della giurisprudenza italiana / VIGLIANISI FERRARO, Angelo. - In: RIVISTA DI DIRITTO PRIVATO. - ISSN 1128-2142. - 1(2020), pp. 85-107.
Danno da illegittimo trattamento dei dati personali, tra "inasprimento sanzionatorio" europeo ed "interpretazioni restrittive" della giurisprudenza italiana
Angelo Viglianisi Ferraro
2020-01-01
Abstract
On 11th November 2008, four important decisions of the Italian Corte di Cassazione (United Sections) fixed a new and singular interpretation of Article 2059 of the Italian Civil Code (about “non-patrimonial damage”), by establishing principles that must be applied by all Italian courts. According to the Supreme Court Judges, compensation of non pecuniary loss requires previous assessment of the elements of civil tort (conduct – damage – causation) and, in cases where the law does not specifically provide for its recovery, compensation can be allowed only where there is a grave violation of the constitutional rights of the person and the damage is serious. The Third Section of the Court decided recently to apply the same rules in the matter of the right to privacy (although in this case there is a specific provision for the compensation of non-patrimonial damages). The solution cannot be shared. The “filters” introduced by the Supreme Court appear to be more appropriate for the evaluation of the “quantum” rather than the “an” debeatur. The recent interpretation of Article 2059 and of many rules created to protect important fundamental rights (like privacy) ultimately takes the Italian Juridical System very far from the models and the guidelines followed in Europe.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Viglianisi Ferraro_2020_RDP_Danno_editor.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
876.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
876.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.