Processing citrus fruits into juice generates large amounts of by-products, mainly pomaces. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of the composition in phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of juices and pomaces of four citrus fruits from Southern Italy, i.e., mandarin, lemon, orange, and bergamot. Juices were produced by squeezing the fruits into an electrical juicer, whereas pomaces were obtained as by-products of the juice extraction. The phytochemical content of the samples was studied by targeted LC and GC approaches. Results indicated that lemon provided the juice with the greatest phenolic content. It was abundant in eriocitrin (90.9 ± 10.8 mg kg−1 FW), isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside (47.3 ± 8.03 mg kg−1 FW), and rutin (78.9 ± 14.5 mg kg−1 FW). Likewise, lemon pomace was the richest in phenolics, mostly narirutin (130 ± 14.7 mg kg−1 FW). As regards carotenoids, mandarin and orange pomaces were equally (p > 0.05) prominent sources of the compounds, providing primarily lutein and β-cryptoxanthin. The phytochemical profile of lemon and mandarin pomaces was unknown up to date. Bergamot accumulated great amounts of VOCs. In particular, bergamot juice was rich in monoterpenes, e.g., α-pinene (375 ± 62.7 mg kg−1 FW) and γ-terpinene (551 ± 67 mg kg−1 FW). The study investigated for the first time the carotenoid and VOCs profiles of bergamot products, and of mandarin and lemon pomaces. Since, citrus pomaces contained great amounts of phytochemicals, they should find new applications in the food and cosmetic industries.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Differences in the composition of phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and volatiles between juice and pomace of four citrus fruits from Southern Italy

Sicari V.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Processing citrus fruits into juice generates large amounts of by-products, mainly pomaces. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of the composition in phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of juices and pomaces of four citrus fruits from Southern Italy, i.e., mandarin, lemon, orange, and bergamot. Juices were produced by squeezing the fruits into an electrical juicer, whereas pomaces were obtained as by-products of the juice extraction. The phytochemical content of the samples was studied by targeted LC and GC approaches. Results indicated that lemon provided the juice with the greatest phenolic content. It was abundant in eriocitrin (90.9 ± 10.8 mg kg−1 FW), isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinoside (47.3 ± 8.03 mg kg−1 FW), and rutin (78.9 ± 14.5 mg kg−1 FW). Likewise, lemon pomace was the richest in phenolics, mostly narirutin (130 ± 14.7 mg kg−1 FW). As regards carotenoids, mandarin and orange pomaces were equally (p > 0.05) prominent sources of the compounds, providing primarily lutein and β-cryptoxanthin. The phytochemical profile of lemon and mandarin pomaces was unknown up to date. Bergamot accumulated great amounts of VOCs. In particular, bergamot juice was rich in monoterpenes, e.g., α-pinene (375 ± 62.7 mg kg−1 FW) and γ-terpinene (551 ± 67 mg kg−1 FW). The study investigated for the first time the carotenoid and VOCs profiles of bergamot products, and of mandarin and lemon pomaces. Since, citrus pomaces contained great amounts of phytochemicals, they should find new applications in the food and cosmetic industries.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].
2020
Aroma
Bergamot
Lemon
Mandarin
Pigments
Sweet orange
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Multari_2020_Eur Food Res tech_Differences_editor.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.43 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/65166
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact