In the ongoing work, the digestion process of recalcitrant agricultural wastes (olive wastes and citrus pulps) mixed in different proportions with, livestock manures, milk serum and maize silage for biogas production was studied. Additionally, the chemical composition and the phytotoxicity of the digestates (each separated in liquid and solidfraction)wereevaluatedwiththepurposeofbeingused as organic fertilizer in agriculture. The results demonstrated that animal manure and recalcitrant agricultural wastes, if properly mixed, produced high percentage of biogas. The digestate chemical compositions differed and varied in respect to the kind of feedstock, and the ratio of their mixing to feed the digesters. The digestate from the digester named Fattoria,mainlypoweredwithanimalmanures(poultry,cow andsheep),containedlessphenolsandmoreactivemicrobial biomass than the digestate from the digester Uliva, mainly fed with olive waste and citrus pulp and in minor extent with animal manure and maize silage. Our data showed that the digestatecompositiondependedonthemixofbiomassinput. Additionally, the effects of digestate were plant speciesspecific and a positive correlation between the amount of phenols and the phytotoxic effects of digestate on plants was also well evident. These results suggest that the sustainable disposal of digestates requires a preliminary screening to select the one which better fits the demands of a particular species for optimizing crop production

Use of Recalcitrant Agriculture Wastes to Produce Biogas and Feasible Biofertilizer.

Panuccio MR;Attina' Emilio;Mallamaci C;Muscolo A
2016-01-01

Abstract

In the ongoing work, the digestion process of recalcitrant agricultural wastes (olive wastes and citrus pulps) mixed in different proportions with, livestock manures, milk serum and maize silage for biogas production was studied. Additionally, the chemical composition and the phytotoxicity of the digestates (each separated in liquid and solidfraction)wereevaluatedwiththepurposeofbeingused as organic fertilizer in agriculture. The results demonstrated that animal manure and recalcitrant agricultural wastes, if properly mixed, produced high percentage of biogas. The digestate chemical compositions differed and varied in respect to the kind of feedstock, and the ratio of their mixing to feed the digesters. The digestate from the digester named Fattoria,mainlypoweredwithanimalmanures(poultry,cow andsheep),containedlessphenolsandmoreactivemicrobial biomass than the digestate from the digester Uliva, mainly fed with olive waste and citrus pulp and in minor extent with animal manure and maize silage. Our data showed that the digestatecompositiondependedonthemixofbiomassinput. Additionally, the effects of digestate were plant speciesspecific and a positive correlation between the amount of phenols and the phytotoxic effects of digestate on plants was also well evident. These results suggest that the sustainable disposal of digestates requires a preliminary screening to select the one which better fits the demands of a particular species for optimizing crop production
2016
Anaerobic digestion ; Antioxidant system ; Biogas ;Digestate ; Phytotoxicity ; Seed germination
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Panuccio_2016_Waste Biomass Valorization_Post

Open Access dal 01/11/2017

Descrizione: versione post print
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 497.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
497.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Panuccio_2016_Waste Biomass Valorization_Edit

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 778.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
778.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12318/750
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact